On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 16:59:30 -0700 "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Allow MADV_COLLAPSE behavior for process_madvise(2) if caller has > CAP_SYS_ADMIN or is requesting collapse of it's own memory. This is maximally restrictive. I didn't see any discussion of why this was chosen either here of in the [0/N]. I expect that people will be coming after us to relax this. So please do add (a lot of) words explaining this decision, and describing what might be done in the future to relax it.
