On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 26fda11..2aa35b0 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> +struct kmem_cache *
> +kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *base)
> +{
> + struct kmem_cache *s;
> + unsigned long pages;
> + struct res_counter *fail;
> + /*
> + * TODO: We should use an ida-like index here, instead
> + * of the kernel address
> + */
> + char *kname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%p", base->name, memcg);
Would it make more sense to use the memcg name instead of the pointer?
> +
> + WARN_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> +
> + if (!kname)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + s = kmem_cache_create_cg(memcg, kname, base->size,
> + base->align, base->flags, base->ctor);
> + if (WARN_ON(!s))
> + goto out;
> +
> +
> + pages = slab_nr_pages(s);
> +
> + if (res_counter_charge(memcg_kmem(memcg), pages << PAGE_SHIFT, &fail)) {
> + kmem_cache_destroy(s);
> + s = NULL;
> + }
What are we charging here? Does it ever get uncharged?
-- Suleiman
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href