On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:41 AM David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 07:33:51PM +0200, Adam Sindelar wrote: > > Thanks for fixing this, Adam. > > > mrelease_test should return KSFT_SKIP when process_mrelease is not > > defined, but due to a perror call consuming the errno, it returns > > KSFT_FAIL. > > > > This patch decides the exit code before calling perror. > > > > We should probably also include a "Fixes" line here (see [0]): > > Fixes: 33776141b812 ("selftests: vm: add process_mrelease tests") > > [0]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Sindelar <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v1->v2: Fixed second instance in the same file > > > > tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c > > index 96671c2f7d48..e8b17258579b 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c > > @@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ int main(void) > > > > /* Test a wrong pidfd */ > > if (!syscall(__NR_process_mrelease, -1, 0) || errno != EBADF) { > > + /* perror overwrites errno, so this line must be first */ > > + res = (errno == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : KSFT_FAIL); > > perror("process_mrelease with wrong pidfd"); > > - exit(errno == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : KSFT_FAIL); > > + exit(res); > > } > > > > /* Start the test with 1MB child memory allocation */ > > @@ -156,8 +158,9 @@ int main(void) > > run_negative_tests(pidfd); > > > > if (kill(pid, SIGKILL)) { > > + res = (errno == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : KSFT_FAIL); > > perror("kill"); > > - exit(errno == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : KSFT_FAIL); > > + exit(res); > > } > > > > success = (syscall(__NR_process_mrelease, pidfd, 0) == 0); > > -- > > 2.35.1 > > > > This looks good to me, but it looks like there are a couple of other places > where we're doing the wrong thing, i.e. in run_negative_tests() and after > calling waitpid(). Could you please fix those as well? > > Also adding Suren to cc. Thanks for adding me, David! The fixes look good but there are 5 places in all this fix is needed: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c#L68 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c#L76 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c#L103 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c#L159 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mrelease_test.c#L175 Thanks for catching this, Adam! Suren. > > - David