[PATCH v3 13/16] mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The current comment is confusing because if global or memcg deferred list
in the second tail page is occupied by compound_head, why we still use
page[2].deferred_list here? I think it wants to say that Global or memcg
deferred list in the first tail page is occupied by compound_mapcount and
compound_pincount so we use the second tail page's deferred_list instead.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 12b297f9951d..37f2f11a6d7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
 static inline struct list_head *page_deferred_list(struct page *page)
 {
 	/*
-	 * Global or memcg deferred list in the second tail pages is
-	 * occupied by compound_head.
+	 * See organization of tail pages of compound page in
+	 * "struct page" definition.
 	 */
 	return &page[2].deferred_list;
 }
-- 
2.23.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux