Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:41:18 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Radosław Smogura wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:42:33 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>OK, stupid question... where are patches 1 through 10? I'm guessing
>linux-ext4 wasn't cc'ed on them?
>
>					- Ted
Actually, I added those for --cc (checked in command history). I
think problems went from mail server, it first sent 10 first
patches, then no more, after 20 min I resented patches from 11, but
after few hours some "not sent" patches were sent (I putted self to
cc, so I know). Now, I see those at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/.

Ok, so there's no difference between the patches sent yesterday with
"WIP" in the subject line, and the ones which didn't?  It was just a
resend, then, correct?

      	     	     	       	   	- Ted
Yes, indeed.
Regards

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]