On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 05:47:22AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:44:47AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's worth noting that the check in pgdat_is_empty() is slightly
> > different. I *think* it doesn't matter in practice, yet I wonder if we
> > should simply fixup (currently unused) pgdat_is_empty().
>
> I guess we could change it to
>
> static inline bool pgdat_is_empty(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> {
> return node_start_pfn(pgdat->node_id) == node_end_pfn(pgdat->node_id)
> }
>
> ? And maybe even rename it to to node_is_empty (not sure why but I tend to like
At least I like this name (node_is_empty) as well.
Thanks.
> that more than pgdat)
>
> I could squeeze a "fixup" patch for that before this one.
>
> >
> > Anyhow
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE Labs
>
