KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:28:34 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At this point this is always the same cgroup, but it allows to drop one argument.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Do you mean "no logic change but clean up, dropping an argument" ?
I'm not sure using complicated sc-> is easier than passing an argument..
It also was cleanup-preparation for "memory book keeping",
there I replace struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz with struct book *book,
struct book doesn't know anything about memory-cgroups.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email:<a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx</a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>