On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:35:37PM -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 01:21:38AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 386da09..624a73e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #include <linux/limits.h>
> > #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> > #include <linux/blk_types.h>
> > +#include <linux/kinterval.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
>
> fs.h is an exported header file, whereas kinterval.h is not. So this
> fails scripts/header_check.pl.
>
> I used the workaround below.
>
> -Arun
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index d27dbee..1335a5f 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/ima.h>
> #include <linux/cred.h>
> #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* for inode_has_buffers */
> +#include <linux/kinterval.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
> spin_lock_init(&mapping->private_lock);
> INIT_RAW_PRIO_TREE_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear);
> - INIT_KINTERVAL_TREE_ROOT(&mapping->nocache_tree);
> + INIT_KINTERVAL_TREE_ROOT((struct rb_root *) &mapping->nocache_tree);
> rwlock_init(&mapping->nocache_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(address_space_init_once);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 74b6a97..b4e45e6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> #include <linux/limits.h>
> #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> #include <linux/blk_types.h>
> -#include <linux/kinterval.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -656,7 +655,7 @@ struct address_space {
> spinlock_t private_lock; /* for use by the address_space */
> struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */
> struct address_space *assoc_mapping; /* ditto */
> - struct rb_root nocache_tree; /* noreuse cache range tree */
> + void *nocache_tree; /* noreuse cache range tree */
> rwlock_t nocache_lock; /* protect the nocache_tree */
> } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
> /*
mmh.. a forward declaration of rb_root in fs.h shouldn't be better than
this?
Thanks,
-Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>