On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:27:25AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > In many cases, the hugetlb specific page table routines are the same as > the generic routines. But, there are a few exceptions. IMO, it would > be better to first try to cleanup and unify those routines. That would > make changes to the walker routines less invasive and easier to > maintain. I believe is other code that would benefit from such a > cleanup. Unless there are strong objections, I suggest we move forward > with the optimization here and move the cleanup and possible walker > changes to a later series. No objection on my side, thanks Mike for trying to look into it. -- Peter Xu