Re: [PATCH RFC] userfaultfd: introduce UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_YOUNG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/14/22 11:56, Mike Rapoport wrote:
But, I cannot take it anymore: the list of arguments for uffd stuff is
crazy. I would like to collect all the possible arguments that are used for
uffd operation into some “struct uffd_op”.

Squashing boolean parameters into int flags will also reduce the insane
amount of parameters. No strong feelings though.

Just a quick drive-by comment about boolean arguments: they ruin the
readability of the call sites. In practice, sometimes a single boolean
argument can be OK-ish (still poor to read at the call site, but easier
to code initially), but once you get past one boolean argument in the
function, readability is hopeless:

    foo(ptr, true, false, a == b);

So if you have a choice, I implore you to prefer flags and/or enums. :)


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux