Re: [PATCH v6 03/13] mm/demotion: Return error on write to numa_demotion sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/13/22 11:03 AM, Ying Huang wrote:
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:05 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
On 6/13/22 8:56 AM, Ying Huang wrote:
On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 19:22 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
With CONFIG_MIGRATION disabled return EINVAL on write.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   mm/memory-tiers.c | 3 +++
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index 9c6b40d7e0bf..c3123a457d90 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static ssize_t numa_demotion_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
   {
   	ssize_t ret;

+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION))
+		return -EINVAL;
+

How about enclose numa_demotion_enabled_xxx related code with CONFIG_MIGRATION?


IIUC there is a desire to use IS_ENABLED() in the kernel instead of
#ifdef since that helps in more compile time checks. Because there are
no dead codes during compile now with IS_ENABLED().

IS_ENABLED() is used to reduce usage of "#ifdef" in ".c" file,
especially inside a function.  We have good build test coverage with
0Day now.

To avoid code size inflate, it's better to use #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION.


For a diff like below I am finding IS_ENABLED better.

size memory-tiers.o.isenabled memory-tiers.o
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   4776     989       5    5770    168a memory-tiers.o.isenabled
   5257     990       5    6252    186c memory-tiers.o


modified   mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -710,12 +710,11 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,

 static void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
 {
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 		node_demotion = kcalloc(MAX_NUMNODES, sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
 					GFP_KERNEL);
 		WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
-	}
+#endif
 	hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
 }

@@ -844,14 +843,19 @@ static ssize_t numa_demotion_enabled_show(struct kobject *kobj,
 			  numa_demotion_enabled ? "true" : "false");
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 static ssize_t numa_demotion_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
 					   struct kobj_attribute *attr,
 					   const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
-	ssize_t ret;
-
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+#else
+static ssize_t numa_demotion_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
+					   struct kobj_attribute *attr,
+					   const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+		ssize_t ret;

 	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &numa_demotion_enabled);
 	if (ret)
@@ -859,6 +863,7 @@ static ssize_t numa_demotion_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,

 	return count;
 }
+#endif

 static struct kobj_attribute numa_demotion_enabled_attr =
 	__ATTR(demotion_enabled, 0644, numa_demotion_enabled_show,

I also find that #ifdef config not easier to the eyes. If there is a large code that we can end up #ifdef out, then it might be worth it. IIUC, we might want to keep the establish_migration target to find top_tier rank and lower_tier mask. Once we do that only thing that we could comment out is the node_demotion sysfs creation and I was considering to keep that even if migration is disabled with a write to the file returning EINVAL. I could switch that if you strongly feel that we should hide node_demotion sysfs file.

-aneesh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux