On 07.06.22 11:37, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi David, > > On 6/7/22 09:44, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Ah, that explains things. The man-page info page [1] was/is still >> pointing at that git tree, that's why I wondered what happened. > > Yup. BTW, that reminds me I need to ask how to update that website. > Now that everything goes back to normal, I don't need to; but still > should know how to. > >>>> I'm not very concerned about this, since in essence, a fork of the >>>> manual pages is still very well maintained on my server, and free for >>>> anyone interested in reading up-to-date pages. And since I do this on a >>>> hobby basis (my company doesn't pay me to do this at all), I don't care >>>> at all about not having released in almost a year now. That's more of a >>>> problem for distros and companies, which need releases. For >> >> Heh, including me ;) > > Which part of that text includes you? "interested in reading up-to-date > pages"? Or "need releases"? Or both? :-) A little bit of everything. Obviously, I'm interested in up-to-date man pages for Red Hat Linux users :) >> >>> >>> BTW, I just released a signed git tag in my repo, to make it a bit more >>> secure to know that you're getting my manual pages, and not some MITM >>> fake stuff. >>> >>> <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/src/alx/linux/man-pages/man-pages.git/tag/?h=man-pages-5.19-rc1> >>> >>> My PGP key is signed by mtk. Only trust it if it has his signature. >>> I'm attaching it in this email, so that it can be found in the list (I'm >>> having some issue with the keyserver). >> >> I can spot it on the official git tree [2] as well, essentially via >> alx/main. Nice. > > Yes, and soon in master. :) > Still far from a release, however; I need help with that. What kind of help would you be needing? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb