On 06/07/22 at 11:34am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> __find_vmap_area() finds a "vmap_area" based on passed address.
> It scan the specific "vmap_area_root" rb-tree. Extend the function
> with one extra argument, so any tree can be specified where the
> search has to be done.
>
> There is no functional change as a result of this patch.
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 82771e555273..b60385101897 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -814,9 +814,9 @@ static struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(unsigned long addr)
> return va;
> }
>
> -static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr)
> +static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr, struct rb_root *root)
> {
> - struct rb_node *n = vmap_area_root.rb_node;
> + struct rb_node *n = root->rb_node;
>
> addr = (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)addr);
>
> @@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr)
> struct vmap_area *va;
>
> spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> - va = __find_vmap_area(addr);
> + va = __find_vmap_area(addr, &vmap_area_root);
> spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
>
> return va;
> @@ -2582,7 +2582,7 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
> might_sleep();
>
> spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> - va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
> + va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr, &vmap_area_root);
> if (va && va->vm) {
> struct vm_struct *vm = va->vm;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
