Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:12 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> With memory tiers support we can have memory on NUMA nodes
> in the top tier from which we want to avoid promotion tracking NUMA
> faults. Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers. To
> avoid taking locks, a nodemask is maintained for all demotion
> targets. All NUMA nodes are by default top tier nodes and as
> we add new lower memory tiers NUMA nodes get added to the
> demotion targets thereby moving them out of the top tier.

Check the usage of node_is_toptier(),

- migrate_misplaced_page()
  node_is_toptier() is used to check whether migration is a promotion. 
We can avoid to use it.  Just compare the rank of the nodes.

- change_pte_range() and change_huge_pmd()
  node_is_toptier() is used to avoid scanning fast memory (DRAM) pages
for promotion.  So I think we should change the name to node_is_fast()
as follows,

static inline bool node_is_fast(int node)
{
	return NODE_DATA(node)->mt_rank >= MEMORY_RANK_DRAM;
}

And, as above, I suggest to add memory tier ID and rank to struct
pglist_data directly.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux