Re: Finding kernel RAM consumers ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 08:49 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 21:11 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 07:24:23PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > We have this small embedded target(aarch64) with 32 MB of RAM where the kernel consumes 14420K:
> > > Memory: 22444K/36864K available (3584K kernel code, 698K rwdata, 936K rodata, 320K init, 255K bss, 14420K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> > > 
> > > I want to track down were most of this RAM is consumed so I can trim away some MBs
> > > but I am having a hard time finding may way.
> > > Is there some tool/kernel config that can help me with that?
> > 
> > You may find this series of articles interesting:
> > 
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F741494%2F&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C509eaa2f688b4612945208da44d40494%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637897974658412129%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zP2oazSeoVKiTrbPONqmQXEhzyIIL3pQdvsKfN8nOA0%3D&reserved=0
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F744507%2F&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C509eaa2f688b4612945208da44d40494%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637897974658412129%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9kNmXDhuQ24tWlECGrYQOqaaTsc0sOO4TozcQBk5aYc%3D&reserved=0
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F746780%2F&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C509eaa2f688b4612945208da44d40494%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637897974658412129%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZFu0q4tXX677JwkgBqK73M8WxDrhylw0XnuEw5Y8mA4%3D&reserved=0
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F748198%2F&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C509eaa2f688b4612945208da44d40494%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637897974658412129%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ws5Rlrhts80ndzr8aEv3xTu6EmCnND3L%2FmGXHLDaygw%3D&reserved=0
> > 
> > While they're a little old and they're targetting a much smaller system
> > than yours, they may give you some ideas of things you can try and tools
> > you can use.
> 
> Those are interesting, thanks.
> In my case it is the amount of work space RAM allocated that is a bit much. The kernel code/data
> is 5+MB but the total need is 14MB, 9MB is buffer and similar.
> 
>  Jocke

Found something, arm64 only supports mem model SPARSEMEM_EXTREME and it uses most of my memory.
Tried to force SPARSEMEM_STATIC but that didn't boot, is STATIC even cheaper ? 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux