Re: ZSWAP still considered experimental?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 31 May 2022 10:41:05 +0200 Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In https://bugs.debian.org/970639 the request was made to enable ZSWAP.
> 
> Upon it was (rightly) noted that zswap.rst contained this:
> > Zswap is a new feature as of v3.11 and interacts heavily with memory
> > reclaim.  This interaction has not been fully explored on the large set
> > of potential configurations and workloads that exist.  For this reason,
> > zswap is a work in progress and should be considered experimental.
> 
> Furthermore the mm/Kconfig contains this on the ZSWAP option:
> > Compressed cache for swap pages (EXPERIMENTAL)
> 
> But the contents of that zswap.rst hasn't changed since the initial commit  
> 61b0d76017a50c263c303fa263b295b04e0c68f6 from 2013-07-11.
> 
> Similarly, that line in Kconfig hasn't changed either since the initial commit
> 2b2811178e85553405b86e3fe78357b9b95889ce from 2013-07-11.
> 
> Should ZSWAP should still be considered experimental or not?

I'd say "not".




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux