Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We have helpers for a reason. > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 1678802e03e7..cb583fcbf5bf 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -4750,7 +4750,7 @@ int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) > * over remote processors and spread off node memory allocations > * as wide as possible. > */ > - if (node_state(pgdat->node_id, N_CPU) && pgdat->node_id != numa_node_id()) > + if (node_is_toptier(pgdat->node_id) && pgdat->node_id != numa_node_id()) > return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN; > > if (test_and_set_bit(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags)) Are we really looking at the top tier in a tiered memory hierarchy here? The comment seems to suggest we are looking at local NUMA node? -aneesh
