On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 07:33:50PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > > ptep is unmapped too early, so ptep will be accessed while it's unmapped. > > Fix it by deferring pte_unmap() until page table checking is done. > > > > Fixes: 80110bbfbba6 ("mm/page_table_check: check entries at pmd levels") > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/page_table_check.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_table_check.c b/mm/page_table_check.c > > index 3692bea2ea2c..971c3129b0e3 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_table_check.c > > +++ b/mm/page_table_check.c > > @@ -234,11 +234,11 @@ void __page_table_check_pte_clear_range(struct mm_struct *mm, > > pte_t *ptep = pte_offset_map(&pmd, addr); > > unsigned long i; > > > > - pte_unmap(ptep); > > for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) { > > __page_table_check_pte_clear(mm, addr, *ptep); > > addr += PAGE_SIZE; > > ptep++; > > } > > + pte_unmap(ptep); > > But ptep was mutated in the loop. So surely this needs to be: > > pte_unmap(ptep - PTRS_PER_PTE); > > or you'll be unmapping the wrong page. Right, thank you Matthew. Miaohe, please store the ptep, or maybe drop this patch entirely. Thanks, Pasha