Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/18] iomap: Add iomap_page_create_gfp to allocate iomap_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 * This function returns a newly allocated iomap for the folio with the settings
> + * specified in the gfp parameter.
> + *
> + **/
>  static struct iomap_page *
> -iomap_page_create(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
> +iomap_page_create_gfp(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> +		unsigned int nr_blocks, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct iomap_page *iop = to_iomap_page(folio);
> -	unsigned int nr_blocks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
> +	struct iomap_page *iop;
>  
> -	if (iop || nr_blocks <= 1)
> +	iop = kzalloc(struct_size(iop, uptodate, BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_blocks)), gfp);
> +	if (!iop)
>  		return iop;
>  
> -	iop = kzalloc(struct_size(iop, uptodate, BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_blocks)),
> -			GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>  	spin_lock_init(&iop->uptodate_lock);
>  	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
>  		bitmap_fill(iop->uptodate, nr_blocks);
> @@ -61,6 +71,18 @@ iomap_page_create(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
>  	return iop;
>  }
>  
> +static struct iomap_page *
> +iomap_page_create(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	struct iomap_page *iop = to_iomap_page(folio);
> +	unsigned int nr_blocks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
> +
> +	if (iop || nr_blocks <= 1)
> +		return iop;
> +
> +	return iomap_page_create_gfp(inode, folio, nr_blocks, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);

Overly long line here.

Mor importantly why do you need a helper that does not do the number
of blocks check?  Why can't we just pass a gfp_t to iomap_page_create?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux