On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:39:06AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> This is still something consumers need; at the moment users have no
> idea if data is *actually* being encrypted.
As it was already pointed out - that's in /proc/cpuinfo.
> I think Martin has done an admirable job going down the rabbit hole
> to add this functionality in the proper manner -- so it's actually
> accurate and useful for other use cases to that of fwupd.
Only after I scratched the surface as to why this is needed.
> At the moment my professional advice to people asking about Intel
> memory encryption
Well, what kind of memory encryption? Host, guest?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
