On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:48 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:03:38 -0800 > Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:38 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki >> <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:37:13 -0800 >> > Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > Do you want to do memory locking by setting swap_limit=0 ? >> >> hmm, not sure what do you mean here? >> > > Do you want to add memory.swap.limit_in_bytes file for limitting swap > and do memrory.swap.limit_in_bytes = 0 > for guaranteeing any anon pages will never be swapped-out ? That's not what I was thinking. But I am quite curious what's our decision making of not going there at the first place? I won't be surprised to see objections of setting swap as separate limit, but didn't find the pointer online yet. Thanks --Ying > > > > Thanks, > -Kame > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href