Re: [PATCHv5 06/12] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kirill, I've been tracking these changes to see if we can handle the unaccepted memory type for SEV-SNP, but testing has been an issue. The proposed patch in Ovmf to introduce unaccepted memory seems to have stalled out last September (https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg35842.html) and is particularly difficult to adapt to SEV-SNP since it doesn't follow the TDVF way of initializing all memory. Is there a different development I might have missed so that we might test these cases? Without the UEFI introducing EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY type, any kernel uses are essentially dead code.

Thanks,
-Dionna

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:04 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 06:30:13PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> I find it harder to follow.

If in doubt, always consider using a helper function:

---

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
index 7db2f41b54cd..cf475243b6d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef       struct {
 } efi_table_hdr_t;

 #define EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY                 7
+#define EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY          15

 #define EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE \
                                ((u64)0x0000000000010000ULL)    /* higher reliability */
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
index 28b91df9d31e..39bb4c319dfc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
@@ -671,6 +671,23 @@ static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
+
+/*
+ * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if supported) are guaranteed
+ * to be free.
+ */
+static inline bool memory_type_is_free(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
+{
+       if (md->type == EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
+               return true;
+
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY))
+               if (md->type == EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY)
+                       return true;
+
+       return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Returns true if we processed the EFI memmap, which we prefer over the E820
  * table if it is available.
@@ -723,21 +740,9 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
                 * free memory and thus available to place the kernel image into,
                 * but in practice there's firmware where using that memory leads
                 * to crashes.
-                *
-                * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if
-                * supported) are guaranteed to be free.
                 */
-
-               switch (md->type) {
-               case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
-                       break;
-               case EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY:
-                       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY))
-                               break;
+               if (!memory_type_is_free(md))
                        continue;
-               default:
-                       continue;
-               }

                if (efi_soft_reserve_enabled() &&
                    (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_SP))
--
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette


--
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux