On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:24:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, May 11 2022 at 09:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 05:27:45AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > >> +#define LAM_NONE 0 > >> +#define LAM_U57 1 > >> +#define LAM_U48 2 > > > >> +#define X86_THREAD_LAM_U48 0x1 > >> +#define X86_THREAD_LAM_U57 0x2 > > > > Seriously pick an order and stick with it. I would suggest keeping the > > hardware order and then you can do: > > > >> +static inline unsigned long lam_to_cr3(u8 lam) > >> +{ > > > > return (lam & 0x3) << X86_CR3_LAM_U57; > > This "works" because the hardware ignores LAM_U48 if LAM_U57 is set, but > I'd rather make that exclusive in the prctl() as setting both does not > make any sense. Yes, I was very much assuming the interface would not allow setting both, that would be daft.