Re: [PATCH v4] mm: fix is_pinnable_page against on cma page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/11/22 16:08, Minchan Kim wrote:
OK, so the code checks the wrong item each time. But the code really
only needs to know "is either _CMA or _ISOLATE set?". And so you

Yes.

can just sidestep the entire question by writing it like this:

int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);

if (mt & (MIGRATE_ISOLATE | MIGRATE_CMA))
	return false;

I am confused. Isn't it same question?

                                                     set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
if (get_pageblock_migrate(page) & MIGRATE_CMA)

                                                     set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_CMA)

if (get_pageblock_migrate(page) & MIGRATE_ISOLATE)

Well no, because the "&" operation is a single operation on the CPU, and isn't going to get split up like that.


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux