On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:53AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:23:33PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > The randstruct GCC plugin gets upset when it sees struct addresspace > > (which is randomized) being assigned to a struct page (which is not > > randomized): > > Well, the right fix here is to remove this abuse from the driver, not > to legitimize it as part of a "driver" patch touching a core mm header Right, I didn't expect anyone to like the new "overloaded" member. Mainly I'd just like to understand how niu _should_ be fixed. Is using the "private" member the correct thing here? > that doesn't even cc the mm list. Oops, yes, sorry. -- Kees Cook
