Re: [PATCH] percpu: improve percpu_alloc_percpu event trace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 7 May 2022 17:51:16 +0300
Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The same messages are generated for any other gfp_t argument in trace events.
> As far as I understand it is not a bug per se,
> but trace macros lacks __force attribute in 'gfp_t'-> 'unsigned long' casts.
> The same thing happens with mode_t and with some other places using __print_flags()
> for __bitwise marked types.

I'm curious as to where the gfp_t to unsigned long is happening in the
macros?

-- Steve




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux