On 4/14/22 10:57, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > Print cache name in tracepoints. If there is no corresponding cache > (kmalloc in SLOB or kmalloc_large_node), use KMALLOC_{,LARGE_}NAME > macro. > > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> Regarding tracepoints, I'm not sure it's a good idea to unify kmalloc and kmem_cache_alloc. I think the common use case is to trace kmalloc as there are many different callers, and then I'm not interested in kmem_cache_alloc callers much. What I would suggest instead is: - drop the _node versions, add node to normal versions - drop the kmem_alloc EVENT_CLASS, as kmalloc is different enough from kmem_cache_alloc (see next points), define separately as TRACE_EVENT(). - printing cache_name makes sense to add for kmem_cache_alloc (also allows filtering events) but not for kmalloc. - kmem_cache_alloc with name can then drop the bytes_req, bytes_alloc as they are fixed for given name (and can be read from slabinfo). Not using a common tracepoint will prevent some later unifications/cleanup (patch 21?), but hopefully not too much?