[PATCH 2/2] mm: slab: fix comment for __assume_kmalloc_alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>

The comment next to the __assume_kmalloc_alignment definition is not
precise: kmalloc relies on kmem_cache_alloc, so kmalloc technically returns
pointers aligned to both ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN and ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN,
not only to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN.

(See create_kmalloc_cache()->create_boot_cache()->calculate_alignment()
 for SLAB and SLUB and __do_kmalloc_node() for SLOB.)

Clarify the comment.

The assumption specified by __assume_kmalloc_alignment is still correct,
although it can be made stronger. I'll leave this to a separate patch.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/slab.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 8cc1d54e56ad..06323a4beff0 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -210,9 +210,9 @@ void kmem_dump_obj(void *object);
 #endif
 
 /*
- * kmalloc and friends return ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN aligned
- * pointers. kmem_cache_alloc and friends return ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
- * aligned pointers.
+ * kmem_cache_alloc and friends return pointers aligned to ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN.
+ * kmalloc and friends return pointers aligned to both ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
+ * and ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, but here we only assume the former alignment.
  */
 #define __assume_kmalloc_alignment __assume_aligned(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN)
 #define __assume_slab_alignment __assume_aligned(ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux