On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:41 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Any particular reason for the explicit "q" suffix? The register already
> denotes the opsize and the generated opcode is the same.
No, I just added the 'q' prefix to distinguish it from the 'l'
instruction working on the same register one line earlier.
And then I wasn't consistent throughout, because it was really just
about me thinking about that "here we can use 32-bit ops, and here we
are working with the full possible 64-bit range".
So take that code as what it is - an untested and slightly edited
version of the code you sent me, meant for "how about like this"
purposes rather than anything else.
Linus
