On 02/01/2012 04:44 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Will git-mv end up with a better commit? > > Just use > > git format-patch -C good idea, patch looks clean with -C. So there should be no much problem for review. Also because there's also Makefile changes, I want to still send as one patch with all changes. How do you think? > > to generate the patch and it should be fine. > >>> BTW, I think tools/slub/slabinfo.c should be included in tools/vm/ as >>> well, will move it in v2 patch >> >> CC Christoph. Maybe not a big deal since it's already under tools/. > > I'm certainly fine with moving it to tools/vm. -- Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>