Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] userfaultfd: add /dev/userfaultfd for fine grained access control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel,

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:29:41PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -65,6 +66,8 @@ struct userfaultfd_ctx {
>  	unsigned int flags;
>  	/* features requested from the userspace */
>  	unsigned int features;
> +	/* whether or not to handle kernel faults */
> +	bool handle_kernel_faults;

Could you help explain why we need this bool?  I failed to figure out
myself on the difference against "!(ctx->flags & UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY)".

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux