Re: [RFC] Expose a memory poison detector ioctl to user space.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/26/22 11:02, Jue Wang wrote:
>>> Are there any other physical addresses which are RAM but should not have
>>> the detector used on them?
> In theory, if some physical address range are never / very rarely
> accessed, they can be exempted.

How would userspace know to exempt them?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux