On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 03:45:02PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 02:33:19PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > > Missed calling flush_cache_range() before removing the sharing PMD entrires, > > otherwise data consistence issue may be occurred on some architectures whose > > caches are strict and require a virtual–>physical translation to exist for > > a virtual address. Thus add it. > > > > Fixes: 6dfeaff93be1 ("hugetlb/userfaultfd: unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp") > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE is only definded on riscv, arm64 and > x86. All of them do not have a VIVT cache. In others words, > flush_cache_range() is null on those architectures. So I suspect > in practice this does not cause any issue. It is better to > clarify this in commit log. Looks correct. > > Anyway: > > Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, -- Peter Xu