Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_track_caller()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_track_caller()
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:05:13 +0200
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew WilCox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220414085727.643099-5-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
References: <20220414085727.643099-1-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> <20220414085727.643099-5-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0

On 4/14/22 10:57, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> Make kmalloc_track_caller() wrapper of kmalloc_node_track_caller().

Looks like there's an immediate benefit of SLUB not throwing away the caller
pointer anymore in case of kmalloc_large().

> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/23] common kmalloc for SLUB and SLAB v2
  - From: Hyeonggon Yoo
- [PATCH v2 04/23] mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_track_caller()
  - From: Hyeonggon Yoo

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] tick/sched: Ensure quiet_vmstat() is called when the idle tick was stopped too
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] selftests: cgroup: add a selftest for memory.reclaim
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 04/23] mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_track_caller()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] mm/slab_common: cleanup kmalloc_track_caller()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]