On 20.04.22 10:40, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Bring common functions to a new file while keeping code as much same as > possible. These functions can be used in the new tests. This helps in > avoiding code duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in V6: > - Correct header files inclusion > > Changes in V5: > Keep moved code as same as possible > - Updated macros names > - Removed macro used to show bit number of dirty bit, added a comment > instead > - Corrected indentation > --- > tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 7 +- > tools/testing/selftests/vm/madv_populate.c | 34 +----- > .../selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c | 79 +------------ > tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.h | 9 ++ > 5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/vm_util.h > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile > index 5e43f072f5b76..4e68edb26d6b6 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += hugepage-mremap > TEST_GEN_FILES += hugepage-shm > TEST_GEN_FILES += hugepage-vmemmap > TEST_GEN_FILES += khugepaged > -TEST_GEN_FILES += madv_populate > +TEST_GEN_PROGS = madv_populate > TEST_GEN_FILES += map_fixed_noreplace > TEST_GEN_FILES += map_hugetlb > TEST_GEN_FILES += map_populate > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += on-fault-limit > TEST_GEN_FILES += thuge-gen > TEST_GEN_FILES += transhuge-stress > TEST_GEN_FILES += userfaultfd > -TEST_GEN_FILES += split_huge_page_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS += split_huge_page_test > TEST_GEN_FILES += ksm_tests > > ifeq ($(MACHINE),x86_64) > @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.sh > KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1 > include ../lib.mk > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> BTW, I realized that my madv_populate test fails when run without softdirty support in the kernel. Eventually we should sense support somehow and skip softdirty tests. Maybe we can sense by writing to some page and then testing if the page is reported as softdirty. If it isn't, we know the kernel doesn't support it (or is extremely buggy :D ). Such a sense check would be common functionality in the helper file as well. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
