x86/powerpc has it's implementation of copy_mc_to_user but not use #define
to declare.
This may cause problems, for example, if other architectures open
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC, but want to use copy_mc_to_user() outside the
architecture, the code add to include/linux/uaddess.h is as follows:
#ifndef copy_mc_to_user
static inline unsigned long __must_check
copy_mc_to_user(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt)
{
...
}
#endif
Then this definition will conflict with the implementation of x86/powerpc
and cause compilation errors as follow:
Fixes: ec6347bb4339 ("x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()")
Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 9b82b38ff867..58dbe8e2e318 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ copy_mc_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
return n;
}
+#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
#endif
extern long __copy_from_user_flushcache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index f78e2b3501a1..e18c5f098025 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ copy_mc_to_kernel(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
unsigned long __must_check
copy_mc_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
+#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
#endif
/*
--
2.25.1
