On 2022/4/15 10:15, Davidlohr Bueso
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Peng Liu wrote:
Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online
nodes. The changes will make the code simplified.
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 2e4d8d9fb7c6..4c529774cc08 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6953,7 +6953,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
if (hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] == 0)
continue;
- if (!node_state(nid, N_ONLINE)) {
+ if (!node_online(nid)) {
You could update mm/page_ext.c as well
pr_warn("hugetlb_cma: invalid node %d specified\n", nid);
hugetlb_cma_size -= hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid];
hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] = 0;
@@ -6992,7 +6992,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
}
reserved = 0;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_ONLINE) {
+ for_each_online_node(nid) {
... and arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c for this.
.
Thank you very much. I catch this.
