> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > index 7ec38194f8e1..be6d65ead7ec 100644 > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk) > */ > set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags); > > - /* Drop a reference taken by wake_oom_reaper */ > + /* Drop a reference taken by queue_oom_repaer */ > put_task_struct(tsk); > } > > @@ -644,12 +644,12 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused) > struct task_struct *tsk = NULL; > > wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL); > - spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock); > + spin_lock_irq(&oom_reaper_lock); > if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) { > tsk = oom_reaper_list; > oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list; > } > - spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock); > + spin_unlock_irq(&oom_reaper_lock); > > if (tsk) > oom_reap_task(tsk); > @@ -658,22 +658,50 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused) > return 0; > } > > -static void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk) > +static void wake_oom_reaper_fn(struct timer_list *timer) > { > - /* mm is already queued? */ > - if (test_and_set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAP_QUEUED, &tsk->signal->oom_mm->flags)) > - return; > + struct task_struct *tsk = container_of(timer, struct task_struct, oom_reaper_timer); > + struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->signal->oom_mm; > + unsigned long flags; > > - get_task_struct(tsk); > + /* The victim managed to terminate on its own - see exit_mmap */ > + if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)) { > + put_task_struct(tsk); > + return; > + } > > - spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&oom_reaper_lock, flags); > tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list; > oom_reaper_list = tsk; > - spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&oom_reaper_lock, flags); > trace_wake_reaper(tsk->pid); > wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait); > } > > +/* > + * Give OOM victims some head room to exit themselves. If they do not exit > + * on their own the oom reaper is invoked. > + * The timeout is basically arbitrary and there is no best value to use. > + * The longer it will be the longer the worst case scenario OOM can > + * take. The smaller the timeout the more likely the oom_reaper can get > + * into the way and release resources which could be needed during the > + * exit path - e.g. futex robust lists can sit in the anonymous memory > + * which could be reaped and the exit path won't be able to let waiters > + * know the holding task has terminated. > + */ > +#define OOM_REAPER_DELAY (2*HZ) > +static void queue_oom_repaer(struct task_struct *tsk) > +{ > + /* mm is already queued? */ > + if (test_and_set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAP_QUEUED, &tsk->signal->oom_mm->flags)) > + return; > + > + get_task_struct(tsk); > + timer_setup(&tsk->oom_reaper_timer, wake_oom_reaper_fn, 0); > + tsk->oom_reaper_timer.expires = jiffies + OOM_REAPER_DELAY; > + add_timer(&tsk->oom_reaper_timer); > +} > + > static int __init oom_init(void) > { > oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper"); > @@ -681,7 +709,7 @@ static int __init oom_init(void) > } > subsys_initcall(oom_init) > #else > -static inline void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk) > +static inline void queue_oom_repaer(struct task_struct *tsk) > { > } > #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */ > @@ -932,7 +960,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message) > rcu_read_unlock(); > > if (can_oom_reap) > - wake_oom_reaper(victim); > + queue_oom_repaer(victim); > > mmdrop(mm); > put_task_struct(victim); > @@ -968,7 +996,7 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message) > task_lock(victim); > if (task_will_free_mem(victim)) { > mark_oom_victim(victim); > - wake_oom_reaper(victim); > + queue_oom_repaer(victim); > task_unlock(victim); > put_task_struct(victim); > return; > @@ -1067,7 +1095,7 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc) > */ > if (task_will_free_mem(current)) { > mark_oom_victim(current); > - wake_oom_reaper(current); > + queue_oom_repaer(current); > return true; > } Thanks for the code Michal-- It does seem to fix our issue! I will post it after I finish running it through a few more test cases, and our internal testing suites. Cheers, -- Nico