Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] hugetlb: Fix return value of __setup handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2022/4/13 16:21, Muchun Song wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 04:16:11PM +0800, liupeng (DM) wrote:
On 2022/4/13 15:55, Muchun Song wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:29:14AM +0000, Peng Liu wrote:
When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
string.

The following phenomenon is observed:
   cmdline:
    hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
   dmesg:
    HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
    HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
    Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"

Since hugetlb will print warning/error information before return for
invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.

Can't return -EINVAL? It is weird to return 1 on failure.

Thanks.

.
Not against "return -EINVAL", but consistent with:
1d02b444b8d1 ("tracing: Fix return value of __setup handlers")
I think it is better not return 1.  I don't think it's a good habit we
should follow.
/*
 * NOTE: __setup functions return values:
 * @fn returns 1 (or non-zero) if the option argument is "handled"
 * and returns 0 if the option argument is "not handled".
 */
#define __setup(str, fn)               \
       __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0)


1 or -EINVAL should ok, and  most __setup return 1 for know ;)

Thanks.

Thanks.

.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux