On Sat, 2022-04-09 at 17:34 +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account when shrink lruvec. So we can
> save a bit of stack space by shrinking the array size of nr and targets
> to NR_LRU_LISTS - 1. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 59b96320f481..0e5818970998 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2881,8 +2881,9 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>
>
> static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> - unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> - unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> + /* LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account. */
> + unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> + unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> unsigned long nr_to_scan;
> enum lru_list lru;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
As Christoph pointed out, this is hacky without much benefit. Please
drop this patch.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
