On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 07:37:01PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:57:49PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > In preparation for supporting a dynamic kmalloc() minimum alignment, > > allow architectures to define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN independently of > > ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. In addition, always define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN even if > > an architecture does not override it. > > > > After this patch, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is expected to be used in static > > alignment annotations and defined by an architecture to be the maximum > > alignment for all supported configurations/SoCs in a single Image. > > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, if different, is the minimum alignment guaranteed > > by kmalloc(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] > Sorry for the noise I made due to misunderstanding :) > Now this patch looks good to me and I think it's worth adding. > > Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> > > and works fine with SLAB/SLOB/SLUB on my arm64 machine. > > Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the review and test. We still need to solve the potential crypto issues raised by Herbert before making the change. -- Catalin
