On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 11:43, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/6/22 15:15, Marco Elver wrote: > > Calling kmem_obj_info() via kmem_dump_obj() on KFENCE objects has been > > producing garbage data due to the object not actually being maintained > > by SLAB or SLUB. > > > > Fix this by implementing __kfence_obj_info() that copies relevant > > information to struct kmem_obj_info when the object was allocated by > > KFENCE; this is called by a common kmem_obj_info(), which also calls the > > slab/slub/slob specific variant now called __kmem_obj_info(). > > > > For completeness, kmem_dump_obj() now displays if the object was > > allocated by KFENCE. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220323090520.GG16885@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ > > Fixes: b89fb5ef0ce6 ("mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB") > > Fixes: d3fb45f370d9 ("mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLAB") > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks. > Given the impact on slab, and my series exposing the bug, I will add this to > slab tree. It's already in Andrew's tree: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220406192351.2E115C385A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u Does your series and this patch merge cleanly? If so, maybe leaving in -mm is fine. Of course I don't mind either way and it's up to you and Andrew. Thanks, -- Marco