* Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> [220405 05:25]: > Hi Liam, > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 02:35:36PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote: > > Now that the vma iterator is in the kernel, remove the workaround. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c | 7 ------- > > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c > > index 3ed39c61a510..930a0bc4cac4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c > > @@ -8,13 +8,6 @@ > > #include <asm/cpufeature.h> > > #include <asm/mte.h> > > > > -#ifndef VMA_ITERATOR > > -#define VMA_ITERATOR(name, mm, addr) \ > > - struct mm_struct *name = mm > > -#define for_each_vma(vmi, vma) \ > > - for (vma = vmi->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) > > -#endif > > I already have this revert queued up as an arm64 fix: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/fixes&id=a0ab7e5bc9651d65637f50ee9c09e083919677ed > > Should land for -rc2. Thanks Will. Note that I'm asking Andrew to include the set into mmotm and not directly into linux-next this time as requested by Andrew. Thanks, Liam
