On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 15:46, Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name:
> swapper/0
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> ...........
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt16-yocto-preempt-rt
> #22 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
> rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c
> dump_stack+0x10/0x12
> __might_resched.cold+0x13b/0x173
> rt_spin_lock+0x5b/0xf0
> ___cache_free+0xa5/0x180
> qlist_free_all+0x7a/0x160
> per_cpu_remove_cache+0x5f/0x70
> smp_call_function_many_cond+0x4c4/0x4f0
> on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x49/0xc0
> kasan_quarantine_remove_cache+0x54/0xf0
> kasan_cache_shrink+0x9/0x10
> kmem_cache_shrink+0x13/0x20
> acpi_os_purge_cache+0xe/0x20
> acpi_purge_cached_objects+0x21/0x6d
> acpi_initialize_objects+0x15/0x3b
> acpi_init+0x130/0x5ba
> do_one_initcall+0xe5/0x5b0
> kernel_init_freeable+0x34f/0x3ad
> kernel_init+0x1e/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> When the kmem_cache_shrink() be called, the IPI was triggered, the
> ___cache_free() is called in IPI interrupt context, the local-lock or
> spin-lock will be acquired. on PREEMPT_RT kernel, these lock is
> replaced with sleepbale rt-spinlock, so the above problem is triggered.
> fix it by move the qlist_free_allfrom() the IPI interrupt context to
> the task context when PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Add raw_spinlock protect per-cpu shrink qlist.
>
> mm/kasan/quarantine.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/quarantine.c b/mm/kasan/quarantine.c index
> 08291ed33e93..0e33d30abb8d 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,17 @@ static unsigned long quarantine_size; static
> DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(quarantine_lock);
> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(remove_cache_srcu);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +struct cpu_shrink_qlist {
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + struct qlist_head qlist;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_shrink_qlist, shrink_qlist) = {
> + .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(shrink_qlist.lock),
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> /* Maximum size of the global queue. */ static unsigned long
> quarantine_max_size;
>
> @@ -311,12 +322,23 @@ static void qlist_move_cache(struct qlist_head
> *from, static void per_cpu_remove_cache(void *arg) {
> struct kmem_cache *cache = arg;
> - struct qlist_head to_free = QLIST_INIT;
> struct qlist_head *q;
> -
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + struct qlist_head to_free = QLIST_INIT; #else
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct cpu_shrink_qlist *sq;
> +#endif
> q = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_quarantine);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> qlist_move_cache(q, &to_free, cache);
> qlist_free_all(&to_free, cache);
> +#else
> + sq = this_cpu_ptr(&shrink_qlist);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sq->lock, flags);
> + qlist_move_cache(q, &sq->qlist, cache);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sq->lock, flags); #endif
> }
>
> /* Free all quarantined objects belonging to cache. */ @@ -324,6
> +346,10 @@ void kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(struct kmem_cache
> *cache) {
> unsigned long flags, i;
> struct qlist_head to_free = QLIST_INIT;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + int cpu;
> + struct cpu_shrink_qlist *sq;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Must be careful to not miss any objects that are being
> moved from @@ -334,6 +360,16 @@ void kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(struct kmem_cache *cache)
> */
> on_each_cpu(per_cpu_remove_cache, cache, 1);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + sq = per_cpu_ptr(&shrink_qlist, cpu);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sq->lock, flags);
> + qlist_move_cache(&sq->qlist, &to_free, cache);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sq->lock, flags);
> + }
> + qlist_free_all(&to_free, cache);
>
>I think now there is another subtle bug.
>I assume that by the time kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(cache) returns all objects belonging to the cache must be freed. I think there are scenarios where it's not the case.
>Consider there is thread 1 that calls kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(A) and thread 2 that calls kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(B).
>Consider that kasan_quarantine_remove_cache callbacks for both A and B has finished and shrink_qlist contains all objects that belong to caches A and B.
>Now thread 1 executes for_each_online_cpu part and collects all objects into the local to_free list.
According to my understanding
Thread 1 only collects objects which belong to caches A , because the qlist_move_cache(&sq->qlist, &to_free, cache)
Will filtered again, or did I miss something?
Thanks
Zqiang
>Now thread 2 executes the for_each_online_cpu, calls qlist_free_all (on an empty list) and returns from kasan_quarantine_remove_cache.
>Then cache B is completely destroyed and freed.
>Now thread 1 resumes and calls qlist_free_all for objects from cache B.
>Bang!
> +#endif
> +
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&quarantine_lock, flags);
> for (i = 0; i < QUARANTINE_BATCHES; i++) {
> if (qlist_empty(&global_quarantine[i]))
> --
> 2.25.1
>
