[PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The sentence
"but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving"
should be rephrased with
"but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving"
where "mempolicy" is a struct name.

This work is coauthored by
Yinan Zhang
Jiajian Ye
Shenghong Han
Chongxi Zhao
Yuhong Feng
Yongqiang Liu

Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..d0111d1e370d 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 			/* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't
 			 * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
 			 * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node,
-			 * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
+			 * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving.
 			 */
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 				nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp,
-- 
2.31.1







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux