[RFC PATCH linux-next] mm/secretmem: secretmem_iops can be static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mm/secretmem.c:173:31: warning: symbol 'secretmem_iops' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 24209f2f4d62 ("mm/secretmem: fix panic when growing a memfd_secret")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/secretmem.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c
index a83e98aa3a7b3..ddf45c0435be7 100644
--- a/mm/secretmem.c
+++ b/mm/secretmem.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int secretmem_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 	return simple_setattr(mnt_userns, dentry, iattr);
 }
 
-const struct inode_operations secretmem_iops = {
+static const struct inode_operations secretmem_iops = {
 	.setattr = secretmem_setattr,
 };
 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux