>Hi, > >On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:46:20AM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote: >> >> > >> >> >I'm still not following. The reserved region sizes are available in the >> >> >existing memblock debugfs. >> >> >Why the names are important? What is the value of having names for *some* >> >> >of the reserved regions? >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> There are many memory regions in memblock debugfs memory/reserved, and some might >> >> be splited or merged with other region. Among regions in debugfs, we can't find >> >> the one we defined in device tree. Especially it is difficult to find the region we >> >> described size only without start address. >> >> >> >> On mobile environment, memory is used by not only CPU but also GPU, Camera, Secure >> >> world, Audio, ETC. To support them, there are many reserved regions described in >> >> device tree. So the name is quite important to recognize a region. And with thename >> >> we can compare reserved memory map with other map. >> > >> >You still didn't describe your use case. What is the problem your patches >> >are trying to solve? Why is it important to know what is the use of particular >> >reserved region? >> > >> >You propose complex mechanism that seems to fit very particular scenario >> >and sprinkle some calls to this mechanism at random places because you need >> >to "compare reserved memory map with other map". >> > >> >Does not sound convincing to me, sorry. >> >> As I said serveral times, I want a simple knob showing all reserved >> memory status. The current debugfs, device tree do not show all those >> information I want. I think you also know that. i.e. late freed pages, >> splited or merged memblock, address defined at boot time, kernel size, >> ETC. > >I know that there is not much information about reserved memory exposed and >I understand *what* are you trying to achieve. But you never provided >details about *why* you want this information exposed. > >I don't mind providing more visibility into reserved memory attributes in >general, but I'd like to see something way more simple and localized. > I think the "what" is same as "why". I want to look at all reservced memory status simply in a knob. I also want to make in more simple and localized way, but there seems be several ways to change reserved memory such as cmdline way, freeing after boot, etc. I wanted to cover all those things. That's OK. I hope someone later to try this again to show all the info. >-- >Sincerely yours, >Mike.