Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in list_lru_add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:47 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:45 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:41 PM syzbot
> > <syzbot+f8c45ccc7d5d45fc5965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:
> >
> > Heh, well that's unfortunate.
> >
> > I think the issue is that it triggered a new BUG() that didn't match
> > the previous NULL pointer dereference, so it thinks things are
> > "fixed".
>
> Oh, no, it's because it used the truncated patch that didn't do anything:
>
> > patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1208043d700000
>
> and maybe (due to the racy nature) nothing actually happened.
>

It is not easy to reproduce. I'm also trying to reproduce locally.

#syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
5abc1e37afa0335c52608d640fd30910b2eeda21

Attachment: test.patch
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux