Re: [RFC PATCH] cgroup: introduce proportional protection on memcg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm confused by the aims of this patch. We already have proportional reclaim for memory.min and memory.low, and memory.high is already "proportional" by its nature to drive memory back down behind the configured threshold.

Could you please be more clear about what you're trying to achieve and in what way the existing proportional reclaim mechanisms are insufficient for you?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux