[patch 152/227] mm/cma: provide option to opt out from exposing pages on activation failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/cma: provide option to opt out from exposing pages on activation failure

Patch series "powerpc/fadump: handle CMA activation failure appropriately", v3.

Commit 072355c1cf2d ("mm/cma: expose all pages to the buddy if activation
of an area fails") started exposing all pages to buddy allocator on CMA
activation failure.  But there can be CMA users that want to handle the
reserved memory differently on CMA allocation failure.  Provide an option
to opt out from exposing pages to buddy for such cases.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-1-hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-2-hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/cma.h |    2 ++
 mm/cma.c            |   11 +++++++++--
 mm/cma.h            |    1 +
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/cma.h~mm-cma-provide-option-to-opt-out-from-exposing-pages-on-activation-failure
+++ a/include/linux/cma.h
@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ extern bool cma_pages_valid(struct cma *
 extern bool cma_release(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages, unsigned long count);
 
 extern int cma_for_each_area(int (*it)(struct cma *cma, void *data), void *data);
+
+extern void cma_reserve_pages_on_error(struct cma *cma);
 #endif
--- a/mm/cma.c~mm-cma-provide-option-to-opt-out-from-exposing-pages-on-activation-failure
+++ a/mm/cma.c
@@ -131,8 +131,10 @@ not_in_zone:
 	bitmap_free(cma->bitmap);
 out_error:
 	/* Expose all pages to the buddy, they are useless for CMA. */
-	for (pfn = base_pfn; pfn < base_pfn + cma->count; pfn++)
-		free_reserved_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+	if (!cma->reserve_pages_on_error) {
+		for (pfn = base_pfn; pfn < base_pfn + cma->count; pfn++)
+			free_reserved_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+	}
 	totalcma_pages -= cma->count;
 	cma->count = 0;
 	pr_err("CMA area %s could not be activated\n", cma->name);
@@ -150,6 +152,11 @@ static int __init cma_init_reserved_area
 }
 core_initcall(cma_init_reserved_areas);
 
+void __init cma_reserve_pages_on_error(struct cma *cma)
+{
+	cma->reserve_pages_on_error = true;
+}
+
 /**
  * cma_init_reserved_mem() - create custom contiguous area from reserved memory
  * @base: Base address of the reserved area
--- a/mm/cma.h~mm-cma-provide-option-to-opt-out-from-exposing-pages-on-activation-failure
+++ a/mm/cma.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct cma {
 	/* kobject requires dynamic object */
 	struct cma_kobject *cma_kobj;
 #endif
+	bool reserve_pages_on_error;
 };
 
 extern struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS];
_




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux